Hey, listen. I read this site because I think your thesis is intriguing, but this isn't the evidence you think that it is. With that in mind, I hope you won't automatically bring down the ban hammer because of this comment. I really do find your ideas interesting. It reminds me a lot of Dave McGowan's Programmed to Kill, which I assume you're familiar with. I'm perfectly capable of reading and learning about opinions and concepts alternate to my own.
There aren't a lot of arrest records on the internet before certain years because there was no internet to upload them to. I've done Dahmer research for many years and spent two years researching and editing a book about him; I accessed all kinds of records, and I had to get the paper versions for many of them. But just as an example, I found this in thirty seconds, from the Wisconsin Court system website:
Dahmer wasn't convicted of any murders because he readily confessed to all of them. The trial was over whether he was sane or not—it wasn't over his guilt or innocence—and whether he would go to prison or a mental facility. They didn't have to convict him.
I haven't read all your posts yet and I don't intend to try to "prove" you wrong, but this one just doesn't support your idea.
Yes, all the other serious convictions for similar offenders are publicly listed as these are never expunged. Like Father Burns, whose conviction mirrors the one they accused Jeff with. Same year, same offence, same state. The 15 guilty pleas that they used to 'convict' Jeff with - they don't exist either, as an FOIA request showed that. The court responded in writing confirming they don't exist as, stating, incorrectly, because he was 'found guilty at trial'.
Excellent work and more compelling evidence that Milwaukee was theater.
Hey, listen. I read this site because I think your thesis is intriguing, but this isn't the evidence you think that it is. With that in mind, I hope you won't automatically bring down the ban hammer because of this comment. I really do find your ideas interesting. It reminds me a lot of Dave McGowan's Programmed to Kill, which I assume you're familiar with. I'm perfectly capable of reading and learning about opinions and concepts alternate to my own.
There aren't a lot of arrest records on the internet before certain years because there was no internet to upload them to. I've done Dahmer research for many years and spent two years researching and editing a book about him; I accessed all kinds of records, and I had to get the paper versions for many of them. But just as an example, I found this in thirty seconds, from the Wisconsin Court system website:
https://wcca.wicourts.gov/caseDetail.html?caseNo=1991CF912542&countyNo=40&index=0&mode=details
Dahmer wasn't convicted of any murders because he readily confessed to all of them. The trial was over whether he was sane or not—it wasn't over his guilt or innocence—and whether he would go to prison or a mental facility. They didn't have to convict him.
I haven't read all your posts yet and I don't intend to try to "prove" you wrong, but this one just doesn't support your idea.
I look forward to reading more of your work.
Oh yes, we know it's listed there. Wisconsin doesn't SHARE it.
Note that Wisconsin shares Father Peter Burns' conviction information.
I suggest you read our analysis of the trial:
https://thedahmercase.substack.com/p/jeff-dahmers-trial-an-exploration
Yes, all the other serious convictions for similar offenders are publicly listed as these are never expunged. Like Father Burns, whose conviction mirrors the one they accused Jeff with. Same year, same offence, same state. The 15 guilty pleas that they used to 'convict' Jeff with - they don't exist either, as an FOIA request showed that. The court responded in writing confirming they don't exist as, stating, incorrectly, because he was 'found guilty at trial'.
They're keeping the records created for their fake news story in-house. State-level corruption.
Yes, that’s obvious with what the background checks show.
And if you compare the court record for Burns against what they recorded for Jeff, its very different . Because Burns was a genuine case.